Spot invented combinations
A real author and a real journal can still be assembled into a nonexistent paper. Metadata matching looks for the specific work.
AI citation checker
AI writing tools can produce polished references whose authors, titles, journals, or DOIs do not belong together. Check each citation against scholarly records before you rely on it.
This checks references, not whether the surrounding essay was written by AI. It does not help conceal AI use or bypass university rules.
A real author and a real journal can still be assembled into a nonexistent paper. Metadata matching looks for the specific work.
A resolvable DOI that points to a different title or year is surfaced for review rather than treated as an automatic pass.
Uncertain and not-found results include limitations so you can investigate instead of making an unsupported accusation.
Copy the references exactly as provided, including DOI values and years where available.
The service searches responding scholarly databases and scores the closest bibliographic evidence.
Open the source record, verify that it supports the claim, and cite the version you actually read.
No. It does not estimate whether prose was AI-written. It checks whether references correspond to scholarly metadata.
No tool can guarantee complete database coverage. A strong match provides inspectable evidence; a missing match is a prompt for further review.
Open it, read the relevant work, confirm it supports the claim, and format the citation using the style your course or journal requires.